W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Three solution designs to the first three Graphs use cases

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:13:50 +0000
Message-ID: <4F2A7DFE.9080208@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 01/02/12 16:23, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 2/1/12 11:16 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> I'm not opposed to quads or SPARQL at all; I'm just trying to understand
>> what's reasonable to add (or even change*shudder*) to provide solutions
>> for the use cases.
>>
>>       -- Sandro
> I truly believe, use cases will come from field use across industry.
> When this happens en masse, and the limitations of existing specs and
> implementations a prohibitively taxed, there will be an obvious trigger
> for RDF v.Next. Until then, tinkering with what's in the midst of a
> prolonged and protracted bootstrap will always meet coherent and
> pragmatic resistance :-)

I agree - what we have as use cases now are unlikely to be the only 
important ones as industrial use grows.  We can over-worry about our use 
cases.

	Andy

>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen	
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web:http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile:https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 12:14:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:03 UTC