W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Three solution designs to the first three Graphs use cases

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:59:17 -0500
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1328709557.16744.54.camel@waldron>
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:23 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 2/1/12 11:16 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: 
> > I'm not opposed to quads or SPARQL at all; I'm just trying to understand
> > what's reasonable to add (or even change *shudder*) to provide solutions
> > for the use cases.
> > 
> >      -- Sandro
> I truly believe, use cases will come from field use across industry.
> When this happens en masse, and the limitations of existing specs and
> implementations a prohibitively taxed, there will be an obvious
> trigger for RDF v.Next. Until then, tinkering with what's in the midst
> of a prolonged and protracted bootstrap will always meet coherent and
> pragmatic resistance :-)

I think I agree, but how can a Next Version happen under the pressure of
everyone needing it Right Now?

   -- Sandro

> -- 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kingsley Idehen	      
> Founder & CEO 
> OpenLink Software     
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 14:01:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:03 UTC