- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:10:04 -0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Feb 1, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC#.28A_PRIORITY.29_Exchanging_the_contents_of_RDF_stores > > One of our prioritised UC is "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores". > > I'd like to prose that TriG, without additional semantic or annotation assumptions, meets this UC. The WG should resolve to cover this usage pattern. > > This codifies the situation where no annotations of the graph tagging relationship exists. > > It implies that quads are not an internal implementation matter but a way systems can exchange data. I would submit that in this case, the semantics does need to be specified with more precision than it is at present. So I strongly resist this proposal as stated, with the inclusion of the phrase "without additional semantic ... assumptions". With that phrase removed, I would support it. Pat > > Andy > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 19:10:43 UTC