W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: (A PRIORITY) Exchanging the contents of RDF stores

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:10:04 -0800
Cc: RDF-WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <CA849668-FDBB-4040-B426-41EE3F9A7D52@ihmc.us>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>

On Feb 1, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs-UC#.28A_PRIORITY.29_Exchanging_the_contents_of_RDF_stores
> 
> One of our prioritised UC is "Exchanging the contents of RDF stores".
> 
> I'd like to prose that TriG, without additional semantic or annotation assumptions, meets this UC.  The WG should resolve to cover this usage pattern.
> 
> This codifies the situation where no annotations of the graph tagging relationship exists.
> 
> It implies that quads are not an internal implementation matter but a way systems can exchange data.

I would submit that in this case, the semantics does need to be specified with more precision than it is at present. So I strongly resist this proposal as stated, with the inclusion of the phrase "without additional semantic ... assumptions". With that phrase removed, I would support it.

Pat

> 
> 	Andy
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 19:10:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:03 UTC