W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2007

RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in (approved) test 0009

From: <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:49:43 -0400
To: www-qa@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF76095DA.7676A615-ON85257330.0064DF22-85257330.00672735@lotus.com>
>>I suggest that you look at the test review procedure... 

>Very helpful, indeed. Any more pointers to resolve 'reopen' issues? 

Well, I wrote something [1] for QAWG which discusses post-review 
complaints about test cases, with analogies to errata. 

The set of states that a single test case can occupy has been the 
subject of much discussion over the years. If your procedure keeps 
all submissions, you may need more states (e.g., remanded for fix, 
rejected, etc.) to account for tests that are not to be used but also 
not "active" in the review workflow. I consider this desirable, if it 
stops test case authors from wasting their time writing cases that 
someone else already wrote. 
.................David Marston 

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/att-0026/00-part 
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 18:49:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:23 UTC