W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review

From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:38:58 -0400
To: "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C8B54792.136C3%ogbujic@ccf.org>
Hey Birte.

On 9/14/10 2:56 PM, "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Chime,
> this is to discharge my ACTION-316. Could you summarise what still
> needs to be done to the RIF part of the Ent. Reg. doc or is it ready
> for review for the next round of WDs?

There was feedback from Mike Dean (see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Sep/0002.html)
regarding a few minor changes that I intend to incorporate tonight.  Once
this is done, there will be no other changes I can make without input from
others (see below):

> The rif:imports already has an ed. note, so I think that is fine and
> will not fully be resolved with the RIF WG before the next WD.

Okay, that makes sense, because we didn't get the direct response we were
expecting one way or another.
 
> Ivan also wanted to know whether the URL for the regime is stable:
> http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF
> 
> @Ivan: The namespace doc/URI (not sure how to call it) is already
> created and has some reasonable text:
> Unique identifier defined for RIF Logical Entailment.

I think the only question (long ago) was whether the namespace URL should
indicate variants of RIF entailment, but given where we eventually settled
on simple RIF entailment -  IMO - the current URL is fine and so I will
remove the editorial note regarding this.
 
> http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF is the URI. The specification
> for the entailment is part of the RIF W3C Recommendation.
> 
> For more information about RIF, please refer to the the RIF Document
> Overview Document.
> Ivan Herman, ivan@w3.org, W3C, Semantic Web Activity Lead, May 3rd, 2010
> 
> As far as I can see, only rif:imports is still open.

Yes.  So, once I make the changes tonight, I'll send an indication to that
effect and this will be the only open issue.

-- Chime


===================================

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 19:47:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:43 GMT