W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:59:52 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTim=XpUrekFjQ3uYMgrm4FQa8p7C2w=3KgO=Rn8f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Great. Thanks.

On 14 September 2010 20:38, Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org> wrote:
> Hey Birte.
> On 9/14/10 2:56 PM, "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Chime,
>> this is to discharge my ACTION-316. Could you summarise what still
>> needs to be done to the RIF part of the Ent. Reg. doc or is it ready
>> for review for the next round of WDs?
> There was feedback from Mike Dean (see:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Sep/0002.html)
> regarding a few minor changes that I intend to incorporate tonight.  Once
> this is done, there will be no other changes I can make without input from
> others (see below):
>> The rif:imports already has an ed. note, so I think that is fine and
>> will not fully be resolved with the RIF WG before the next WD.
> Okay, that makes sense, because we didn't get the direct response we were
> expecting one way or another.
>> Ivan also wanted to know whether the URL for the regime is stable:
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF
>> @Ivan: The namespace doc/URI (not sure how to call it) is already
>> created and has some reasonable text:
>> Unique identifier defined for RIF Logical Entailment.
> I think the only question (long ago) was whether the namespace URL should
> indicate variants of RIF entailment, but given where we eventually settled
> on simple RIF entailment -  IMO - the current URL is fine and so I will
> remove the editorial note regarding this.
>> ³http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF is the URI. The specification
>> for the entailment is part of the RIF W3C Recommendation.
>> For more information about RIF, please refer to the the RIF Document
>> Overview Document.
>> Ivan Herman, ivan@w3.org, W3C, Semantic Web Activity Lead, May 3rd, 2010
>> As far as I can see, only rif:imports is still open.
> Yes.  So, once I make the changes tonight, I'll send an indication to that
> effect and this will be the only open issue.
> -- Chime
> ===================================
> P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
> in America by U.S.News & World Report (2009).
> Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
> a complete listing of our services, staff and
> locations.
> Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
> only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
> recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
> you have received this communication in error,  please
> contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
> its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 22:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:01 UTC