W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: Entailment Doc ready for review

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:57:21 +0200
Cc: "Birte Glimm" <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E55A61D8-56EE-4F3B-84DF-142EDCD482D3@w3.org>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
Hey Chime,

On Sep 14, 2010, at 21:38 , Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>> Ivan also wanted to know whether the URL for the regime is stable:
>> http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/RIF
>> @Ivan: The namespace doc/URI (not sure how to call it) is already
>> created and has some reasonable text:
>> Unique identifier defined for RIF Logical Entailment.
> I think the only question (long ago) was whether the namespace URL should
> indicate variants of RIF entailment, but given where we eventually settled
> on simple RIF entailment -  IMO - the current URL is fine and so I will
> remove the editorial note regarding this.

that was indeed the issue. Ie, this problem is now closed. Thanks!


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 15 September 2010 12:54:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:01 UTC