W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2010

Re: review from RIF for SPARQL entailment...

From: Mike Dean <MDEAN@BBN.COM>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:46:01 -0400
Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <DE036696-3490-44CB-9A09-08E5DAC2888B@BBN.COM>
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
> Hello, Mike.  I've made updates (to the editor's draft) in response to Jos'
> original comments and they are available for your review as well:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/xmlspec.xml#id5997834


It looks good to me.  Below are a few suggested editorial changes.



Section 1.2

  RDF supports only [a] few inferences

Section 7

  names and between => names between (or is something else missing?)

  add spaces between RDF, RDFS, OWL-DL

  @@ OWL 2 RL in RIF WG Note @@ => [OWL2-RL-RIF] (already defined)

Section 7.1


  namespace and URI => namespace and IRI

Section 7.2

  RIF-Simple entailment should instead link to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-rif-rdf-owl-20100622/#def-simple-entails

  satisfiable, no => satisfiable; no

  referenced RIF core => referenced RIF Core

  safe RIF core => safe RIF Core

  via rif:imports CURIE => via the object of the rif:imports statement

Section 7.4

  forth recommendation?

  Rif core document => RIF Core document


  update RIF-Core to W3C Recommendation 22 June 2010

  update RIF-RDF to W3C Recommendation 22 June 2010


  update OWL2-RL-RIF to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-rif-owl-rl-20100622/
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 12:46:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:08:07 UTC