- From: Mike Dean <MDEAN@BBN.COM>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:46:01 -0400
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
> Hello, Mike. I've made updates (to the editor's draft) in response to Jos' > original comments and they are available for your review as well: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/xmlspec.xml#id5997834 Chime, It looks good to me. Below are a few suggested editorial changes. Thanks! Mike Section 1.2 RDF supports only [a] few inferences Section 7 names and between => names between (or is something else missing?) add spaces between RDF, RDFS, OWL-DL @@ OWL 2 RL in RIF WG Note @@ => [OWL2-RL-RIF] (already defined) Section 7.1 (http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/Simple)[.] namespace and URI => namespace and IRI Section 7.2 RIF-Simple entailment should instead link to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-rif-rdf-owl-20100622/#def-simple-entails satisfiable, no => satisfiable; no referenced RIF core => referenced RIF Core safe RIF core => safe RIF Core via rif:imports CURIE => via the object of the rif:imports statement Section 7.4 forth recommendation? Rif core document => RIF Core document B.1 update RIF-Core to W3C Recommendation 22 June 2010 update RIF-RDF to W3C Recommendation 22 June 2010 B.2 update OWL2-RL-RIF to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-rif-owl-rl-20100622/
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 12:46:36 UTC