Re: review from RIF for SPARQL entailment...

> Hello, Mike.  I've made updates (to the editor's draft) in response to Jos'
> original comments and they are available for your review as well:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/entailment/xmlspec.xml#id5997834

Chime,

It looks good to me.  Below are a few suggested editorial changes.

Thanks!

	Mike

Section 1.2

  RDF supports only [a] few inferences

Section 7

  names and between => names between (or is something else missing?)

  add spaces between RDF, RDFS, OWL-DL

  @@ OWL 2 RL in RIF WG Note @@ => [OWL2-RL-RIF] (already defined)

Section 7.1

  (http://www.w3.org/ns/entailment/Simple)[.]

  namespace and URI => namespace and IRI

Section 7.2

  RIF-Simple entailment should instead link to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-rif-rdf-owl-20100622/#def-simple-entails

  satisfiable, no => satisfiable; no

  referenced RIF core => referenced RIF Core

  safe RIF core => safe RIF Core

  via rif:imports CURIE => via the object of the rif:imports statement

Section 7.4

  forth recommendation?

  Rif core document => RIF Core document

B.1

  update RIF-Core to W3C Recommendation 22 June 2010

  update RIF-RDF to W3C Recommendation 22 June 2010

B.2

  update OWL2-RL-RIF to http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-rif-owl-rl-20100622/

Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 12:46:36 UTC