W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: all facets covered, list of tests to approve:

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 03:09:16 -0400
Message-ID: <46D7BE9C.7080602@thefigtrees.net>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> [2007-08-17 21:31-0400]
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/facets-coverage#coverage
>>
>> ...shows that the tests under data-r2/* now cover all of the facets 
>> identified by Eric. We've also taken extensive tests from ARQ, a couple of 
>> tests from SteveH, and some tests from Chimezie to cover more complicated 
>> algebraic constructs.
> 
> The coverage report had a mis-informed entry in it 'as the code was
> assuming that all the .rq files were part of the test suite. None of
> the open-world/sameTerm .rqs are parts of tests so this entry was bogus:
> 
> <a href="data-r2/open-world/sameTerm.rq" title="BuiltInCall-sameTerm">1</a>
> 
> The attached diff provides 3 tests for sameTerm. Should I commit it?

Please commit it.

We've received some feedback about possible errata in the test suite 
that we will look at and rectify on Tuesday's telecon. This is one of them.

Can people (Eric, Andy, Steve, anyone else) please report results on 
running these three tests after Eric commits them? (Eric please write 
when committed.)

The other issues are:

+ comparing timezones vs. non-timezoned values in open-world/data-n 
tests (issue for EricP / AndyS ?)

+ <= on equivalent RDF terms with unknown datatypes in 
open-world/open-cmp-02 (issue for EricP / AndyS ?)

+ Problems with turtle in a few datafiles and with the archives (this is 
an issue for me to resolve, probably on Monday once back from my 
vacation (on vacation, I only write emails :-) )

Lee
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 07:09:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT