W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: agenda, 10 October, 14:30 UTC

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:33:49 +0100
Message-Id: <36804475-8357-41E6-8892-E38DBEA62A62@garlik.com>
Cc: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>

Regrets for today, I have pressing work commitments.

- Steve

On 9 Oct 2006, at 17:18, Kendall Clark wrote:

>
> 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 10 October,  
> 2006 at 14:30:00 UTC
> + PatH chairing (thanks, Pat!)
>        + Comments on the agenda?
>        + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>        + LeeF to scribe
>             - supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>        + roll call
>        + TODO: Approve 3 Oct minutes [2], when they appear
>        + next meeting 17 Oct, recruit scribe
>
> 1. Action Items
>
> [NEW] ACTION: AndyS to edit text for DISTINCT = term-distinct
> [NEW] ACTION: Bijan review rq24 against
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 
> 2006Jun/0008.html
> [NEW] ACTION: Bijan to propose text regarding normalization  
> (massaging in general) while reading graphs in
> [NEW] ACTION: Bijan to see if the Chilean's semantics paper offers  
> any (??)
> [NEW] ACTION: EricP to review the tests in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/ 
> 0180.html and
> say yay or nay
> [NEW] ACTION: KendallC to close formsOfDistinct issue
> (CONTINUED -- done, but CVS woes continue...)
> [NEW] ACTION: KendallC to put scope of filters at the top of next  
> week's agenda
> DONE (it's near the top, anyway)
> [NEW] ACTION: PatH to review the proposed tests in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/ 
> 0169.html and
> say yay or nay
> [PENDING] ACTION: bijan to write some text on the D-entailment issue
> [PENDING] ACTION: BijanP to propose some editorial clarification  
> text around DATATYPE
>
> 2. Continue discussion of scope of FILTERs
>
> And LeeF's test cases (2nd edition):
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/ 
> 0243.html
>
> (I'd like to see consensus on at least the design space result from  
> this discussion; and if consensus
> can form around the likely winner, that's even better.)
>
> 3. Is there an issue with NAF & !BOUND?
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/ 
> 0214.html
>
> 4. SolutionModifier
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/ 
> 0263.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/ 
> 0268.html
>
> (If FredZ is present at the telecon, I don't see why this one can't  
> be sorted out. It's relatively
> simple.)
>
> 5. Continue discussion on open world and other value tests
>
> People took actions to review stuff hereabouts, but I don't see any  
> traffice, so I'm bumping this
> down the agenda.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/ 
> att-0018/03-dawg-minutes.html
> [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
> [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 05:33:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT