W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:33:37 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1108996417.4991.964.camel@localhost>

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda


  tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
  supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
    log to appear:http://www.w3.org/2005/02/22-dawg-irc

scribe: Howard Katz

  record for review:
Minutes of DAWG 2005-02-15 telcon for review


next meeting: ftf. see item 2.

continue the following without discussion:

ACTION: DanC to consider Asemantics hosting proposal w.r.t. WG schedule
ACTION: SteveH to propose to host in Southampton right after XTech
ACTION: PatH to propose to host in Florida

ACTION: KendallC: to propose a solution to protocolRootReferent
ACTION: SteveH to to propose tests for str() and =~
ACTION: SteveH to to revise test manifest w.r.t. "background" and named
ACTION: DanC: suggest formal definitions for SOURCE
ACTION: DaveB to to propose source test to approve

comments on agenda progress on the above actions that I
didn't see?

2. ftf5

 Feb 28-1Mar in Cambridge, MA, USA

Input to the agenda?

1st scribe? KendallC?

3. SPARQL QL publication

ACTION: EricP, make sure editor's draft as an inline issue (to be
published) that we need to work this out
DONE: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/

and there was much rejoicing

hmm... trackback for WDs...

4. SPARQL result set

ACTION: DaveB: discuss warnings in result set spec

ACTION: DanC to ask Liam, via SemWeb CG, which XML groups might be
        interested in SPARQL result set WD 

Liam suggests the XSL WG.

5. valueTesting, XSCH

ACTION: EricP and PathH will review XSCH draft document

ACTION: JosD to review section 11 Testing Values
progress: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/0127.html

ACTION JosD: Make 2 test cases over the same data using the
op:dateTime predicate and without using it.

6. accessingCollections

ACTION: DanC to discuss accessingCollections in service description

postpone the issue?

7. Service Descriptions

ACTION: DanC to Write up definitive service concept

ACTION: DanC to write up "sparqlParam" approach (reply to kendallC)

ACTION: KendallC to to think about predicate to relate html-forms and
svc descriptions, and how this goes into the spec

ACTION: KendallC to Add section for service descriptions and put graph
specifying in it to start it off

ACTION: KendallC: discuss warnings in the protocol spec.

ACTION: EricP: to inviestigate WSDL/SOAP encodings of SPARQL protocol
CONTINUED but DanC has made some progress on this with Philippe Le
Hégaret working with WSDL 2.0.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 14:34:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:46 UTC