public-rdf-comments@w3.org from November 2013 by thread

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk (Friday, 29 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of richard@cyganiak.de (Thursday, 28 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of john.goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk (Thursday, 28 November)

[RESOLVED] Re: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives Peter Ansell (Wednesday, 27 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of gavin@carothers.name (Wednesday, 27 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of lbolstad@opera.com (Wednesday, 27 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of w3c_ac@joanneum.at (Wednesday, 27 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk (Monday, 25 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of rsingh@opengeospatial.org (Monday, 25 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of Fabien.Gandon@inria.fr (Monday, 25 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of art.barstow@nokia.com (Monday, 25 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie (Monday, 25 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of mountie@paygate.net (Monday, 25 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of hiroyuki.aizu@toshiba.co.jp (Sunday, 24 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of jim.bell@hp.com (Saturday, 23 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of kidehen@openlinksw.com (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of eric@semanticweb.com (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of bs3131@att.com (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of olszewsl@oclc.org (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of mlvarez@w3.org (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of markus.gylling@gmail.com (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of glenn@skynav.com (Friday, 22 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of raman@google.com (Thursday, 21 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of george.thomas1@hhs.gov (Thursday, 21 November)

Re: [RESOLVED] reminder: ack needed Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs Henry Story (Wednesday, 20 November)

[wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of singer@apple.com (Tuesday, 19 November)

Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Peter Ansell (Sunday, 17 November)

TriG compatibility with N-Quads Richard Smith (Sunday, 17 November)

Awkward TriG compatibility with N3 Richard Smith (Sunday, 17 November)

TriG examples not conforming to grammar Richard Smith (Sunday, 17 November)

Bare collections in Turtle and TriG Richard Smith (Sunday, 17 November)

Underspecification of prefixed names in Turtle Richard Smith (Sunday, 17 November)

Error in RDF/JSON example 7 Gregg Kellogg (Thursday, 14 November)

New RDF 1.1 publications & request for implementer feedback Guus Schreiber (Sunday, 10 November)

[RESOLVED] Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Alex Milowski (Sunday, 10 November)

[RESOLVED] Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Alex Milowski (Sunday, 10 November)

Re: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives Peter Ansell (Thursday, 7 November)

Re: N-Quads backwards compatibility with respect to UTF-8/US-ASCII Peter Ansell (Thursday, 7 November)

N-Quads and N-Triples Candidate Recommendations and Normative links to RDF-1.1 Concepts Peter Ansell (Thursday, 7 November)

Re: Merging and improving the Turtle test suite(s) Eric Prud'hommeaux (Wednesday, 6 November)

Re: PROPOSED to RESOLVE ISSUE-127 with Canonical N-Triples Gregory Williams (Wednesday, 6 November)

[RESOLVED] Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine Gregory Williams (Wednesday, 6 November)

Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (ACTION-268) Gregg Kellogg (Sunday, 3 November)

Re: Turtle "coverage" test suite issues with N-Triples Eric Prud'hommeaux (Sunday, 3 November)

Absolute URIs for Turtle tests Eric Prud'hommeaux (Sunday, 3 November)

Re: reified statements in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux (Sunday, 3 November)

Re: Surrogate Code Points in Tests? Eric Prud'hommeaux (Sunday, 3 November)

Re: Collection / Grammar Issue Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: [Turtle] Please show/explain hexadecimal-encoded characters in comments Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Which characters are allowed in IRIREF in Turtle 2013? Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Turtle tests blank ID patches, and EARL report for Serd Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Turtle version naming? Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013 Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-163: Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 Simon Grant (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Language-tagged strings in Turtle Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Problem with Hash based Linked Data URIs Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Re: Increased lookahead requirements in the Turtle draft Eric Prud'hommeaux (Saturday, 2 November)

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2013 09:54:18 UTC