- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 12:51:17 +0900
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Le 7 déc. 2006 à 14:01, olivier Thereaux a écrit :
> On Dec 6, 2006, at 14:49 , Karl Dubost wrote:
>>
>> I have modified CssStyleRule.java line 87 to 100.
>> Not committed yet. Tell me if I should.
>
> [snip] looks good. go ahead. We have a test instance on qa-dev,
> here's the process.
>
>
> * ssh root@qa-dev
ok
> * cd /usr/local/Jigsaw/Jigsaw/WWW/css-validator/
ok
> * cvs update
ok
> * if code has been modified, also do:
> javac -O `find . -name \*.java`
> * if necessary, restart jigsaw by doing screen -r , ctrl-c, up and
> return (as root)
does that mean I need to edit the files in one local editor, either
emacs or vi.
>> Though I have an issue I wanted to get rid of ul at the level of
>> vAtRule. The problem is that this piece of code is in the HTML
>> template and not in the java code. :) There's an in-between thing
>> going on here :)
>
> The fact that the markup is in the template is not such a bad
> thing. Ideally of course we would have a three-tiered solution as
> you suggest (code without markup, markup, and localized messages)
> enforced more strictly.
>
> There may be a reason why the opening <ul ... is in the templates
> and the closing one in the java code, but I doubt it. Markup should
> be moved to the templates if possible.
yep +1
>> Do we have a testing instance of the CSS validator somewhere so
>> when we modify we can test? Though I guess I could install it on
>> my laptop. :)
>>
>
> Yes, see above. Ping me if you need help with it.
So to be really sure to understand. I test there, and then if it's
good I can commit on the real stuff?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 03:51:52 UTC