W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: prov-overview for review for fpwd (ISSUE-605)

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:52:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRptq4vnds2h9Bz4nr8gtsZxwsvo=V50f=nxGQ1doK-e+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ivan,

Thanks for the comments. I'll integrate them when I go through the document
before staging. On the implementations, we have this page:
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvImplementations

which we can change in our final version to the wiki or somewhere else.

cheers
Paul


On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Paul,
>
> Thanks!
>
> small comments:
>
> - the header 'PROV family of documents' appears twice
> - in the list of documents, the first item should say (this document)
> instead having a circular reference
> - In section 1: 'This instantiated by various serializations' -> 'This is
> instantiated by various serializations'
> - In section 1: 'To help developers and user create valid provenance' ->
> 'To help developers and users to create valid provenance'
> - Section 1: refers to the various blocks in the figure, but it does not
> say anything about 'PROV-LINKS'.
> - The figure is a matter of taste, of course. But I usually look at these
> figures as, sort of, stacks; for me the figure suggests that the PROV-DM is
> based on the PROV-DC document. I would probably try to move these somehow
> on the left side, and leave the PROV-DM block as the base.
> - The remark on Prov-O: "This is intended for the Linked Data and Semantic
> Web community and is useful for developers wishing to create RDFa mark-up."
> Did you mean 'RDF mark-up'? I do not think that a restriction on RDFa is
> necessary or useful here...
> - I am not sure the term 'Roadmap' is the right one for the header of
> section 2. 'available documents'?
> - In the final version would it be worth making a reference to
> implementations/tools? A possibility is to link to
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV
>
> in case you guys fill this with your tools, that is:-) Alternatively, the
> implementation report may be used as well.
>
>
> As for your questions below:
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2012, at 09:51 , Paul Groth wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
>
> > Questions for the reviewers:
> > - Can this document be released as FPWD?
>
> Absolutely. Yes
>
> > - If not, what are the blocking issues?
> > - If yes, are there other issues to work on?
>
> See my comments above. I do not consider them as blocking.
>
> Ivan
>
> >
> > The aim is to vote on FPWD release at the teleconference on Thursday.
> > Can you please confirm you can review the document ahead of the call?
>
> I think I am late with it, I do this at the airport of San Jose, and it is
> still early... But I hope it is helpful nevertheless!
>
> ivan
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> > [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/overview/overview.html
> > [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/605
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> > Assistant Professor
> > - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
> >   Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
> > - The Network Institute
> > VU University Amsterdam
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:52:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:52:58 GMT