W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ

From: Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:44:06 -0500
Message-Id: <6317DAD8-CB9B-47D3-B063-1EE28AF759FD@rpi.edu>
Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>


Sent from my iPad

On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:24, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote:

> 
>> 2)
>> I am uncomfortable with the phrase "and by extension the resources it contains" in:
>> 
>> "might indicate a provenance service providing information about that dataset,
>> and by extension the resources it contains:"
>> 
>> since "void:Dataset 'containing' resources" is ill defined, and even if we
>> stated void:inDataset, the provenance of the dataset is not necessarily the
>> provenance of the resources that the dataset describes.
> 
> Yes, it was probably an ill-chosen example, though it seemed like a good idea at the time to link to other metadata work.  I'll see if I can think of something less controversial to use.



I think the void example is fine, I would suggest to just remove the phrase :

>> and by extension the resources it contains



Tim


> 
> #g
> --
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org
>> <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I had an action (but no issue) to expand the discussion of provenance service
>>> discovery to take account of prov:hasProvenanceService.  I've done this, and
>>> added an example related to a VOiD dataset description.  Revised text is at:
>>> 
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#provenance-service-discovery
>>> 
>>> Feedback welcome.
>>> 
>>> #g
>>> --
> 
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 13:44:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 13:44:43 GMT