W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:24:20 +0000
Message-ID: <50AC8FB4.80909@ninebynine.org>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Tim,

Thanks for your feedback.

On 20/11/2012 18:38, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> Graham,
>
> 1)
> Your capitalization of VoID is incorrect. It's a quite "of" :-)

Doh, I don't know how I missed that.  Consistently.  I'll fix it.

> 2)
> I am uncomfortable with the phrase "and by extension the resources it contains" in:
>
> "might indicate a provenance service providing information about that dataset,
> and by extension the resources it contains:"
>
> since "void:Dataset 'containing' resources" is ill defined, and even if we
> stated void:inDataset, the provenance of the dataset is not necessarily the
> provenance of the resources that the dataset describes.

Yes, it was probably an ill-chosen example, though it seemed like a good idea at 
the time to link to other metadata work.  I'll see if I can think of something 
less controversial to use.

#g
--

>
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org
> <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had an action (but no issue) to expand the discussion of provenance service
>> discovery to take account of prov:hasProvenanceService.  I've done this, and
>> added an example related to a VOiD dataset description.  Revised text is at:
>>
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#provenance-service-discovery
>>
>> Feedback welcome.
>>
>> #g
>> --
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 08:25:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 08:25:35 GMT