W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Provenance service discovery in PROV-AQ

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:53:35 +0000
Message-ID: <50B33C1F.1030809@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Tim Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Done.  Thanks.

#g
--

On 21/11/2012 13:44, Tim Lebo wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Nov 21, 2012, at 3:24, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>> 2)
>>> I am uncomfortable with the phrase "and by extension the resources it contains" in:
>>>
>>> "might indicate a provenance service providing information about that dataset,
>>> and by extension the resources it contains:"
>>>
>>> since "void:Dataset 'containing' resources" is ill defined, and even if we
>>> stated void:inDataset, the provenance of the dataset is not necessarily the
>>> provenance of the resources that the dataset describes.
>>
>> Yes, it was probably an ill-chosen example, though it seemed like a good idea at the time to link to other metadata work.  I'll see if I can think of something less controversial to use.
>
>
>
> I think the void example is fine, I would suggest to just remove the phrase :
>
>>> and by extension the resources it contains
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>>
>> #g
>> --
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org
>>> <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I had an action (but no issue) to expand the discussion of provenance service
>>>> discovery to take account of prov:hasProvenanceService.  I've done this, and
>>>> added an example related to a VOiD dataset description.  Revised text is at:
>>>>
>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/paq/prov-aq.html#provenance-service-discovery
>>>>
>>>> Feedback welcome.
>>>>
>>>> #g
>>>> --
>>
>
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 14:19:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 November 2012 14:19:43 GMT