W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:51:02 -0500
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <05EE187B-BA38-4E99-9AF3-D7A0CE469022@rpi.edu>
To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Satya,

Does the latest DM address your concern?

May we close this issue?

Thanks,
Tim

On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Generation and usage have both optional id:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage
> 
> Luc
> 
> On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288
>> 
>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>> On product: mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o
>> 
>>     If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya)
>> 
>>     Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute" list. (Satya)
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 14:51:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT