W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 22:08:03 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|fe8fc2cbc7b6b1dde49261ac2920cb57o24M8808L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F553943.1080601@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi,

Generation and usage have both optional id:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage

Luc

On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288
>
> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
> On product: mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o
>
>      If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya)
>
>      Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute" list. (Satya)
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage
>
>
>
>    
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:08:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT