W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o]

From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:43:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOMwk6yjG2rwB++fuJJdawJjcTH+MbRunASVL71s587o73LA0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Luc,
The issue is about having activity id as optional for Generation and not
for Usage - this is distinct from id of the Generation and Usage record id.

Thanks.

Best,
Satya

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Generation and usage have both optional id:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/**raw-file/default/model/prov-**
> dm.html#term-Generation<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Generation>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/**raw-file/default/model/prov-**
> dm.html#term-Usage<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-Usage>
>
> Luc
>
>
> On 05/03/12 13:45, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm<->
>>  prov-o]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/issues/288<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/288>
>>
>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>> On product: mapping prov-dm<->  prov-o
>>
>>     If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so
>> for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya)
>>
>>     Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute"
>> list. (Satya)
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**wiki/ProvRDF#Usage<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 15:44:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT