- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:20:17 -0500
- To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Daniel, Based on your feedback, I have removed the RL-induced non-DM clutter classes. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/1317e302e11e Regards, Tim On Mar 5, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Daniel, > > > On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Daniel Garijo wrote: > >> Hi all, >> this morning I've just updated the ontology and I see that it has changed a lot. >> • We have a Roled class. I don't remember having discussed this change. >> • Instantaneous event: I'm ok with that, since we discussed it on moday. >> • Activity is under "Durable". Why?? >> • qualified has dissapeared, and we have "involved" range Element AND Involvement? (I think this is a typo, it should be the union). > > I added qualified back in, I mistook qualified for the old qualifiable, which wasn't around long. > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/rev/59419250de25 > > >> • I'm still unhappy with the TemporalEntity name. What about just "Time", or "Temporal"? >> Now there are many classes with multiple parent classes, and there will be some unions. Will this be RL compliant? >> >> > > The rest of your concerns were in response to Paolo's feedback, ISSUE-302 and we will handle it as part of that. > > Regards, > Tim > > >> I haven't gone through all the mail discussions, since there were like 30 new this morning. But PLEASE, could we >> have a wiki page or another ontology where we gather the feedback and discuss it within the prov-o team before >> implementing to the ontology? Tha last one we had may have had some issues, but it was much more simple >> and easy to read... >> >> Thanks, >> >> Daniel >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 15:21:12 UTC