W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [provo] Proposal for a Structure of the PROVO HTML Document

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 21:59:39 +0000
Message-ID: <4F55374B.4090500@ninebynine.org>
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
I'm a bit surprised by the proposed structure: I have come to see the trio of 
artifact/entity, activity and agent as the kernel elements of most of the 
defined provenance models, so it's surprising to see them separated here.

#g
--

On 05/03/2012 16:19, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Khalid,
>
> For information, Paolo and I have decided to restructure prov-dm (WD5) as follows,
> in several components. The intent was to address Jun's comment on core vs common.
>
> - Activity, Entity, Events
>
> - Agency and Responsibility
>
> - Derivations
> wasDerivedFrom, revision, quotation, original sources
> - Alternate relations (title to be defined)
> Alternate, Specialization
> - Annotation
> - Collections
>
> So, in other words, we'll drop the common/core. It would be good if it was not
> used in the prov-o.
>
> Cheers,
> Luc
>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 22:06:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT