W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm]

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:05:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRqUCYwTjEi9r=dYrC9DtBNR8Wzd60OWgaN6XbCbVhy1Vw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc,

Err.. I took the definition of quotation directly from the dictionary :-)

So you'd have to argue with them.

cheers
Paul

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue
Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/357
>
> Raised by: Luc Moreau
> On product: prov-dm
>
>
> The definition of Quotation [1] is:
>
> A quotation is the repeat of (some or all of) an entity, such as text or image, by someone other than its original author.
>
> Do we really mean that I wouldn't be entitled to quote myself?    If it's the case, what does it mean to be "someone other than the original author"? are alternates OK?
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#concept-quotation
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 08:06:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT