W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:29:48 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|cf50aef54e615d40dc5d1600d7002c50nA6MV708L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4EB85BDC.5020402@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim and Paolo,

What about "A qualifier is a set of name-value pairs ..."

I propose to close this issue, unless you state otherwise.

Thanks,
Luc

On 07/11/11 08:26, Paolo Missier wrote:
> I don't think they should have an order
>
> -Paolo
>
> On 11/6/11 1:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/143
>>
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: Data Model
>>
>> Qualifiers are defined as having order. Why do they need to be ordered?
>>
>>
>> 5.5.1 Qualifier
>>
>> "A qualifier is an ordered list of name-value pairs, used to qualify 
>> use expressions, generation expressions and control expressions."
>>
>>
>> 6. PROV-DM Extensibility Points
>>
>> "Qualifiers offer a mechanism to describe modalities of use, 
>> generation, and control They consist of ordered sequence of 
>> name-value pairs."
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 22:31:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:47 GMT