W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model]

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:23:48 +0000
Message-ID: <4ECBB074.4030807@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
works for me!

-Paolo

On 11/7/11 10:29 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Tim and Paolo,
>
> What about "A qualifier is a set of name-value pairs ..."
>
> I propose to close this issue, unless you state otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Luc
>
> On 07/11/11 08:26, Paolo Missier wrote:
>> I don't think they should have an order
>>
>> -Paolo
>>
>> On 11/6/11 1:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/143
>>>
>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>> On product: Data Model
>>>
>>> Qualifiers are defined as having order. Why do they need to be ordered?
>>>
>>>
>>> 5.5.1 Qualifier
>>>
>>> "A qualifier is an ordered list of name-value pairs, used to qualify
>>> use expressions, generation expressions and control expressions."
>>>
>>>
>>> 6. PROV-DM Extensibility Points
>>>
>>> "Qualifiers offer a mechanism to describe modalities of use,
>>> generation, and control They consist of ordered sequence of
>>> name-value pairs."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>


-- 
-----------  ~oo~  --------------
Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 14:24:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:48 GMT