W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:19:10 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|b27b6951be9633b98b18422df592f508nA6MKY08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4EB8595E.20109@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim, Stephan, Jim,

Here is a first draft of the literal section.


It would be good to have your feedback.
If you find it's ok, than the literals examples in the document need to 
be checked.


On 07/11/11 18:15, Jim McCusker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Paolo Missier<Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>  wrote:
>> DM says:
>> 5.5.5 Literal
>> Literals represent data values such as particular string or integers.
>> My understanding is it's always been used in the standard grammar production
>> meaning (eg: http://savage.net.au/SQL/sql-2003-2.bnf.html#literal). Not so?
> I think a clearer definition would be:
> A Provenance Literal is a "leaf" value. It does not explicitly have
> any outgoing relations (in SW-ish: Is not a subject of any statement)
> in the PROV data model. Any outgoing relations from a Provenance
> Literal is out of scope for the PROV DM.
> Jim
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 22:21:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:10 UTC