W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:18:46 -0600
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <775520E9-6681-499C-97A9-2AF73F9C221A@rpi.edu>
To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
+1 

-- Stephan

On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Paul Groth wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following proposal:
> 
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
> 
> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all process executions to specify a duration.
> 
> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
> 
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval. Statements denoting this duration are optional."
> 
> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> this proposal?
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 22:19:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT