W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:21:12 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTimXXiDjCkOy+rVuR_UaXdzw8O87pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Cc: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1

Satya

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote:

> +1
>
> -- Stephan
>
> On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
> proposal:
> >
> > "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
> >
> > However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all process
> executions to specify a duration.
> >
> > I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
> >
> > "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
> >
> > In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> > this proposal?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 22:21:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT