W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:10:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20090221.071022.76649577.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org

[Draft Response for LC Comment 16] MS6

To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> 
CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org 
Subject: [LC response] To Michael Schneider

Dear Michael,

Thank you for your comment

    <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0007.html>

on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.

Thanks for pointing the divergence between the nomenclature in the OWL 2
documents and that used previously. We have moved from lexical value to
lexical form to be consistent with XML Schema datatypes and RDF. 

The diffs can be found at 
... Syntax 
... Direct Semantics

The working group views this as an editorial change.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
<mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. 

Regards, 
Peter F. Patel-Schneider 
on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group 
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 12:10:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 February 2009 12:10:47 GMT