W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2009

Re: draft response for LC comment 16 (lexical value)

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:48:50 +0000
Message-Id: <6A4274A9-DEEC-419A-AA8E-A81B44991603@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Works for me.

Thanks,
Ian


On 21 Feb 2009, at 12:10, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>
> [Draft Response for LC Comment 16] MS6
>
> To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
> CC: public-owl-comments@w3.org
> Subject: [LC response] To Michael Schneider
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> Thank you for your comment
>
>     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ 
> 2009Jan/0007.html>
>
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> Thanks for pointing the divergence between the nomenclature in the  
> OWL 2
> documents and that used previously. We have moved from lexical  
> value to
> lexical form to be consistent with XML Schema datatypes and RDF.
>
> The diffs can be found at
> ... Syntax
> ... Direct Semantics
>
> The working group views this as an editorial change.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to
> <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should
> suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you
> are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
>
Received on Saturday, 21 February 2009 12:49:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 21 February 2009 12:49:28 GMT