W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation)

From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:54:39 +0100
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1A44B3DE-568D-4D3D-BB10-8D0F6DF0310C@uva.nl>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>

On 24 jan 2008, at 04:42, Jim Hendler wrote:
*snip*
> Syntax: no change
> Semantics: no change
> RDF mapping: no change

Just to be clear: at the current state of the documents this would  
mean that backward compatibility is dropped (i.e. no change equals  
Peter's proposal)

-Rinke


> backward compatibility: maintained
>   -JH
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
>>
>> As I mentioned in the teleconference on 23 January 2008,  I propose  
>> to
>> close ISSUE-90 by deprecating deprecation.
>>
>> This requires the following changes:
>>
>> Syntax: Add a note to the Differences section saying that  
>> deprecation of
>>  	classes, datatypes, and properties is deprecated and is not a
>>  	part of the functional syntax or structural specification.
>>
>> 	No other change.
>>
>> Semantics: No change.
>>
>> RDF Mapping: Add a new section at the (that will be much expanded  
>> later,
>>     	     probably) to mention that owl:DeprecatedClass and
>>     	     owl:DeprecatedProperty are not part of OWL 1.1.
>>
>>    OPTION 1: Add a paragraph to Section 3 saying that triples of the
>>  	     form x rdf:type owl:DeprecatedClass where Type(x) contains
>>  	     owl:Class or rdfs:Datatype, or of the form x rdf:type
>>  	     owl:DeprecatedProperty where Type(x) contains
>>  	     owl:ObjectProperty or owl:DatatypeProperty or
>>  	     owl:AnnotationProperty are removed
>>
>>    OPTION 2: No change to Section 3, which means that use of
>>    	     owl:DeprecatedClass or owl:DeprecatedProperty is not in OWL
>>    	     1.1.
>>
>> I much prefer OPTION 2.
>>
>>
>> peter
>>
>
> "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research,  
> would it?." - Albert Einstein
>
> Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
> Tetherless World Constellation Chair
> Computer Science Dept
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
>
>
>
>

-----------------------------------------------
Drs. Rinke Hoekstra

Email: hoekstra@uva.nl    Skype:  rinkehoekstra
Phone: +31-20-5253499     Fax:   +31-20-5253495
Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke

Leibniz Center for Law,          Faculty of Law
University of Amsterdam,            PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,             The Netherlands
-----------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 07:54:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 January 2008 07:54:59 GMT