- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:55:55 +0100
- To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Note that option 2 will turn an OWL 1.0 DL ontology into OWL 1.1 Full if it uses DeprecatedClass or DeprecatedProperty. -Rinke On 23 jan 2008, at 20:20, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > As I mentioned in the teleconference on 23 January 2008, I propose to > close ISSUE-90 by deprecating deprecation. > > This requires the following changes: > > Syntax: Add a note to the Differences section saying that > deprecation of > classes, datatypes, and properties is deprecated and is not a > part of the functional syntax or structural specification. > > No other change. > > Semantics: No change. > > RDF Mapping: Add a new section at the (that will be much expanded > later, > probably) to mention that owl:DeprecatedClass and > owl:DeprecatedProperty are not part of OWL 1.1. > > OPTION 1: Add a paragraph to Section 3 saying that triples of the > form x rdf:type owl:DeprecatedClass where Type(x) contains > owl:Class or rdfs:Datatype, or of the form x rdf:type > owl:DeprecatedProperty where Type(x) contains > owl:ObjectProperty or owl:DatatypeProperty or > owl:AnnotationProperty are removed > > OPTION 2: No change to Section 3, which means that use of > owl:DeprecatedClass or owl:DeprecatedProperty is not in OWL > 1.1. > > I much prefer OPTION 2. > > > peter ----------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands -----------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 07:56:05 UTC