W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Universal Property

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:35:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20080118.043546.230397867.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: hendler@cs.rpi.edu
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, sattler@cs.man.ac.uk, clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de

Umm, which issue, which objection?  

I could not find an issue whose title mentions a universal property.
I also could not find an objection from Jeremy in the minutes of the
last two TCs.


From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
Subject: Re: Universal Property
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:56:41 -0500

> I am uncomfortable with the closing of this issue over Jeremy's  
> objection - I see very little discussion of the issue, I see no use  
> cases or tests which have been proposed that separate the issue, and  
> I find the theoretical emails to be stuff I cannot understand -- so  
> RPI would like to go on record as voting against the closing of the  
> issue.  We will not create a formal objection, but like Jeremy we  
> reserve the right to create an objection when the document that  
> actually explains this is published
>   -Jim Hendler
>   AC Rep
>   RPI
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 10:04:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC