W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:28:14 -0400
Message-Id: <5DCFA5C6-FDB9-4D71-BBDE-D7E00D7D6517@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>

Yes. This makes sense to me too, Jeremy.

On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would  
>> be desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the  
>> existing EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot.
>> Ian
> Different words to say the same thing:
> Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys.
> The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide  
> historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves  
> (or at least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a long- 
> standing problem.
> Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:28:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:29:01 GMT