Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys

Yes. This makes sense to me too, Jeremy.
-Alan

On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would  
>> be desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the  
>> existing EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot.
>> Ian
>
> Different words to say the same thing:
>
> Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys.
>
> The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide  
> historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves  
> (or at least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a long- 
> standing problem.
>
> Jeremy
>
>