Yes -- thanks! Ian On 29 Apr 2008, at 13:28, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > Yes. This makes sense to me too, Jeremy. > -Alan > > On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> >> Ian Horrocks wrote: >>> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would >>> be desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the >>> existing EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot. >>> Ian >> >> Different words to say the same thing: >> >> Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys. >> >> The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide >> historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves >> (or at least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a >> long-standing problem. >> >> Jeremy >> >> >Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:47:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:47:17 GMT