W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-47: compound keys

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:46:28 +0100
Message-Id: <C97C5331-9F0D-45CB-A61B-084F7F09A568@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>

Yes -- thanks!

Ian


On 29 Apr 2008, at 13:28, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> Yes. This makes sense to me too, Jeremy.
> -Alan
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
>>
>> Ian Horrocks wrote:
>>> This is a postponed issue from the OWL 1 WG saying that it would  
>>> be desirable to have compound keys in OWL. This is covered by the  
>>> existing EasyKeys proposal, so the issue seems moot.
>>> Ian
>>
>> Different words to say the same thing:
>>
>> Proposed to close the issue as addressed by EasyKeys.
>>
>> The reason for copying over the postponed issues is to provide  
>> historical continuity, and I think we should be giving ourselves  
>> (or at least Bijan and Uli) a pat on the back for addressing a  
>> long-standing problem.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:47:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:47:17 GMT