W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

RE: ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to self restrictions

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:53:06 +0200
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A08BDA89@judith.fzi.de>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>> ISSUE-119 (russell paradox): OWL 2 Full may become inconsistent due to
>self restrictions
>Essentially this duplicates ISSUE-117.

ISSUE-117 is (a) much broader in its scope than ISSUE-119, and (b) it is not 
clear at the moment whether completely dropping the comprehension principle 
for self restrictions is the only possible technical solution for this 

>I suggest we only take one of
>them forward, and I am neutral as to which.

Then it makes sense to start with ISSUE-119, which *needs* a solution. The 
more general ISSUE-117 may or may not become a relevant topic /after/ 
resolving ISSUE-119.

>(Although I prefer the term
>schneider paradox to russell paradox. I see the former as the relevant
>specialization of the latter, and the latter is solved, whereas the
>former is not. Moreover the schneider paradox is a variation on the
>patel-schneider paradox ...)

The only comment by me on this will be that there will not be any comment by 
me on this. :)


Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 13:53:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC