W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:52:55 +0100
Message-ID: <480C9C37.6030101@hpl.hp.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Michael Schneider wrote:

> /I/ agree. But let's see what others think. My idea of processing this issue 
> was:
>   1) Raise the issue yesterday.
>   2) Open the issue on Wednesday.
>   3) Tell in next week's agenda that this issue is planned to be closed.
> This would suffice to get most people be aware of it. But if you think this is 
> exaggerated, then we might not even open it on Wednesday...

We have a lightweight process for editorial issues, and I am tentatively 
advocating that this should be used for this issue.

Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 13:53:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC