- From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:07:39 -0400
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
> - to be readable by a wider audience than the other FPWDs > - to allow this wider audience to understand the intended direction of > the WG > - to allow this wider audience to help adjust the direction of the WG > before we have done a lot of work as a WG > This would allow comments along the lines of: > - have you considered this other possible new feature? > - that feature looks like a lot of work, and the motivation looks a bit > skimpy? > - is that feature really needed? [VK] This is great! Some key contributions could also be: - To convey the value proposition of OWL 1.1 in various usage scenarios - To help determine aspects of OWL 1.1 constructs that may not be useful or even disadvantageous in an operational context. ---Vipul The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:07:55 UTC