W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

RE: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less technical documents)

From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:08:42 -0400
Message-ID: <DBA3C02EAD0DC14BBB667C345EE2D124010F057D@PHSXMB20.partners.org>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, <conrad.bock@nist.gov>, <fabian.neuhaus@nist.gov>, <ewallace@nist.gov>, <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>


I agree, it will be a good idea. Hopefully, Sandro can get us a Zakim line for
12:30 PM EDT?

---Vipul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:34 PM
> To: Kashyap, Vipul
> Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider; public-owl-wg@w3.org; conrad.bock@nist.gov;
> fabian.neuhaus@nist.gov; ewallace@nist.gov; dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
> Subject: Re: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less
> technical documents)
> 
> Vipul
> 
> it might be more efficient if people wanting to do some work on the
> 'less technical documents' chatted earlier so that we could present a
> more coherent suggestion to the group as to what we might do. That feels
> to me like a better use of the fifteen minutes of telecon time
> allocated, than to have a more open ended discussion about quite what to
> do.
> 
> I wonder if you, or anyone else, would be available half an hour before
> the telecon; if so, I hope we could just use the WG telecon facilities,
> but start early, and have maybe twenty mins discussion, and then a short
> break before the WG meeting.
> 
> (Sandro would Zakim be available?)
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
> > Thanks for the great work, Jeremy!
> > Maybe we need to spend a little bit of time trying to develop some sort
> of
> > unifying framework.
> >
> > Also, we may need to discuss "features" that are not part of OWL 1.0 or
> OWL 1.1,
> > but were created to address some of the requirements, such as "SEP
> triplets" for
> > anatomical reasoning.
> >
> > Let's discuss this tomorrow.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > ---Vipul
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:06 PM
> > To: Kashyap, Vipul
> > Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider; public-owl-wg@w3.org;
> conrad.bock@nist.gov;
> > fabian.neuhaus@nist.gov; ewallace@nist.gov; dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
> > Subject: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less technical
> > documents)
> >
> >
> > I'm stopping work for the day, my stab so far is
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Features
> >
> > and
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/MotivationsFromLiterature
> >
> >
> > hopefully there's enough there for it to be clear what I am trying to
> do.
> >
> > I still have docs # 38 41 and 44 from OWLED 2007 to integrate, using
> > Bijan's classification.
> >
> > There is, of course, lots of other literature that could be included.
> > (Note the punning section links to OWL 1.0 issues list, and to Alan's
> > recent e-mail - as an example)
> >
> > I doubt I will have much OWL time before the telecon tomorrow.
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >


The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 00:09:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT