W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less technical documents)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:34:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4727A34D.6080403@hpl.hp.com>
To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
CC: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org, conrad.bock@nist.gov, fabian.neuhaus@nist.gov, ewallace@nist.gov, dlm@ksl.stanford.edu


it might be more efficient if people wanting to do some work on the 
'less technical documents' chatted earlier so that we could present a 
more coherent suggestion to the group as to what we might do. That feels 
to me like a better use of the fifteen minutes of telecon time 
allocated, than to have a more open ended discussion about quite what to do.

I wonder if you, or anyone else, would be available half an hour before 
the telecon; if so, I hope we could just use the WG telecon facilities, 
but start early, and have maybe twenty mins discussion, and then a short 
break before the WG meeting.

(Sandro would Zakim be available?)


Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
> Thanks for the great work, Jeremy!
> Maybe we need to spend a little bit of time trying to develop some sort of
> unifying framework.
> Also, we may need to discuss "features" that are not part of OWL 1.0 or OWL 1.1,
> but were created to address some of the requirements, such as "SEP triplets" for
> anatomical reasoning.
> Let's discuss this tomorrow.
> Cheers,
> ---Vipul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:06 PM
> To: Kashyap, Vipul
> Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider; public-owl-wg@w3.org; conrad.bock@nist.gov;
> fabian.neuhaus@nist.gov; ewallace@nist.gov; dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
> Subject: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less technical
> documents)
> I'm stopping work for the day, my stab so far is
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Features
> and
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/MotivationsFromLiterature
> hopefully there's enough there for it to be clear what I am trying to do.
> I still have docs # 38 41 and 44 from OWLED 2007 to integrate, using 
> Bijan's classification.
> There is, of course, lots of other literature that could be included.
> (Note the punning section links to OWL 1.0 issues list, and to Alan's 
> recent e-mail - as an example)
> I doubt I will have much OWL time before the telecon tomorrow.
> Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:34:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:59 UTC