RE: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less technical documents)

Thanks for the great work, Jeremy!
Maybe we need to spend a little bit of time trying to develop some sort of
unifying framework.

Also, we may need to discuss "features" that are not part of OWL 1.0 or OWL 1.1,
but were created to address some of the requirements, such as "SEP triplets" for
anatomical reasoning.

Let's discuss this tomorrow.

Cheers,

---Vipul

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:06 PM
To: Kashyap, Vipul
Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider; public-owl-wg@w3.org; conrad.bock@nist.gov;
fabian.neuhaus@nist.gov; ewallace@nist.gov; dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
Subject: Features and MotivationsFromLiterature (was Re: less technical
documents)


I'm stopping work for the day, my stab so far is
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Features

and

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/MotivationsFromLiterature


hopefully there's enough there for it to be clear what I am trying to do.

I still have docs # 38 41 and 44 from OWLED 2007 to integrate, using 
Bijan's classification.

There is, of course, lots of other literature that could be included.
(Note the punning section links to OWL 1.0 issues list, and to Alan's 
recent e-mail - as an example)

I doubt I will have much OWL time before the telecon tomorrow.

Jeremy



The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 18:09:47 UTC