- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:26:57 +0100
- To: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 24 July 2012 19:29, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Dave Pawson scripsit: > >> If I can derive (for some definition of derive) html5 from MicroXML >> then I would be satisfied. > > If colons are not to be allowed, then HTML-ish documents would have to > be represented in MicroXML using some messy convention, like xlink_href > instead of xlink:href. Just because we allow colons doesn't put > namespaces into the data model. I don't like the assumption in that last sentence John? If (most) see colons in a name, they assume namespaces are valid? Point taken about needing xlink_href, can anyone think of a way round that? Or should we simply allow xlink:href as a name as opposed to a qname? How wrong could it go if we 'assume' that href means xlink:href, when transforming from uxml to html5? If you have wiki access (who does? ) could we create an issues page please? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 06:27:29 UTC