public-microxml@w3.org from July 2012 by author

Alex Brown

• What will success look like for MicroXML? (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: MicroXML should support PHP et al? (Wednesday, 25 July)

Andrew Welch

• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)

Dave Pawson

• XML diff MicroXML? (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Charter (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Charter (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Wednesday, 25 July)
• MicroXML and Json (Wednesday, 25 July)
• MicroXML should support PHP et al? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Reply to address? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)

David Carlisle

• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)

David Lee

• RE: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Charter (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: MicroXML and Json (Wednesday, 25 July)
• RE: Charter (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Charter (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• RE: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Hello, everyone [via MicroXML Community Group] (Monday, 16 July)

Emmanuel Desmontils

• Default namespaces (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)

George Cristian Bina

• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)

Hans Franke

• Re: MicroXML and Json (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Charter (Wednesday, 25 July)
• AW: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Why MicroXML ? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• RE: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• AW: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Reply to address? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)

James Clark

• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Why MicroXML ? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Processing instructions (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• MicroXML wiki (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)

Jeremy H. Griffith

• Re: Processing instructions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)

John Cowan

• Re: Default namespaces (Saturday, 28 July)
• Re: Default namespaces (Saturday, 28 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: What will success look like for MicroXML? (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Starting point (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: MicroXML should support PHP et al? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: MicroXML and Json (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: MicroXML and Json (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: MicroXML should support PHP et al? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Reply to address? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Hello, everyone [via MicroXML Community Group] (Monday, 16 July)

Liam R E Quin

• Re: Processing instructions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)

Michael Sokolov

• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)

Mike Sokolov

• Re: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Why MicroXML ? (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: Starting point (Tuesday, 24 July)

Rushforth, Peter

• RE: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Friday, 27 July)
• RE: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)
• RE: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Tuesday, 24 July)

Szabo, Patrick \(LNG-VIE\)

• AW: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• AW: Starting point (Wednesday, 25 July)
• AW: Some possible MicroXML design goals (Wednesday, 25 July)

Uche Ogbuji

• Re: Default namespaces (Saturday, 28 July)
• Re: Default namespaces (Saturday, 28 July)
• Re: XML diff MicroXML? (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: XML diff MicroXML? (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Processing instructions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: MicroXML is for hand | automated generation (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Reply to address? (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Charter (Thursday, 26 July)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 July 2012 22:27:43 UTC