W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > May 2009

Re: feedback on today's teleconf

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:51:58 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830905210251v4fbec3f4h29a01b4741ad99a3@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Tracker, this is ISSUE-10.

There is another test case to consider,  which I forgot yesterday: we
have to take into account whether a time frame is within the duration
of a file or outside.

So, for #t=x,y request, with x,y integer and y>x , we have several cases:
* x,y <= duration which is the good case,
* x,y > duration, in which case it should be "416 Requested Range Not
Satisfiable" IMHO (same as the other problem cases)
* x,y with x < duration and y > duration, in which case I am not
really sure what to return (probably 206).


Cheers,
Silvia.


2009/5/21 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>:
> Tracker, this is ISSUE-10.
>
>> I had a side discussion about the correct codes to use for some of the
>> test cases.
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TestCasesDiscussion
>>
>> I still think that "416 Requested Range Not Satisfiable" is the
>> correct response to #t=0,0 or to #t=30,0 type requests. There is no
>> fragment (or byte range) there at those URIs and therefore it is a
>> client error.
>
> I agree with all your suggestions, and I think Michael is about to modify
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TestCases accordingly.
> Michael, regarding the problem of adding the status code response for each
> test case, does it mean you need to modify the vocab controlling the test
> cases output?
> Cheers.
>
> †RaphaŽl
>
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
> Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
>
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 09:53:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:33 GMT