W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [media cap] 1st draft agenda for telco

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:13:24 -0800
Message-ID: <4F321284.9020405@alvestrand.no>
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
CC: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 02/07/2012 10:06 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Rich brought up a topic a while ago that may merit some discussion, as I'm also interested in the same:
> Rationale for keeping the definition of the MediaStream interface in the WebRTC spec.
> I know that both PeerConnection and getUserMedia are entry points to get/create media streams. So I'd like to start a conversation about which spec should define the MediaStream interface and why.
We've been over this before (thread "Defining the split..." starting on 
Dec 7).
It petered out pretty quickly, with comments only from you, me and Rich 
Tibbett (who started the thread, and then fell silent).

I'd like to hear from more people before declaring that it's interesting 
to reopen the issue.
(reviewing the thread, I also see that I did not respond to your last 
questions on the thread; do you want to reopen those, or have they 
become overtaken by events in the meantime?)

Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 06:16:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:24:35 UTC