- From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 14:02:17 +0100
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 02/08/2012 07:13 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 02/07/2012 10:06 AM, Travis Leithead wrote: >> Rich brought up a topic a while ago that may merit some discussion, >> as I'm also interested in the same: >> >> Rationale for keeping the definition of the MediaStream interface >> in the WebRTC spec. >> >> I know that both PeerConnection and getUserMedia are entry points >> to get/create media streams. So I'd like to start a conversation >> about which spec should define the MediaStream interface and why. > We've been over this before (thread "Defining the split..." starting > on Dec 7). It petered out pretty quickly, with comments only from > you, me and Rich Tibbett (who started the thread, and then fell > silent). > > I'd like to hear from more people before declaring that it's > interesting to reopen the issue. (reviewing the thread, I also see > that I did not respond to your last questions on the thread; do you > want to reopen those, or have they become overtaken by events in the > meantime?) > > Harald > I will add touching on this topic to the agenda, I don't think we should aim at resolving it at the meeting, but at least express opinions and reasons (e.g. why we should change the split). //Stefan
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 13:05:51 UTC