- From: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:24:32 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- CC: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
>-----Original Message----- >From: Harald Alvestrand [mailto:harald@alvestrand.no] > >On 02/07/2012 10:06 AM, Travis Leithead wrote: >> Rich brought up a topic a while ago that may merit some discussion, as >I'm also interested in the same: >> >> Rationale for keeping the definition of the MediaStream interface in the >WebRTC spec. >> >> I know that both PeerConnection and getUserMedia are entry points to >>get/create media streams. So I'd like to start a conversation about which >>spec should define the MediaStream interface and why. > >We've been over this before (thread "Defining the split..." starting on >Dec 7). >It petered out pretty quickly, with comments only from you, me and Rich >Tibbett (who started the thread, and then fell silent). > >I'd like to hear from more people before declaring that it's interesting >to reopen the issue. >(reviewing the thread, I also see that I did not respond to your last >questions on the thread; do you want to reopen those, or have they >become overtaken by events in the meantime?) My questions at the end of that thread [1] still stand. I don't have a strong grasp on the prior discussions that have formed your view on what the MediaStream is. To that end, some of the arguments you make don't make sense to me. I think hearing some background from you during our upcoming call would be helpful to me, and perhaps others. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2011Dec/0055.html
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:14:26 UTC