W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 20:03:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC82C6F.7040203@w3.org>
To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>


Le 09/05/2011 16:33, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
> Dear Thierry, all,
>
> Here are some comments on the draft CR version.
>
> - status section
>    - typo: convinience ->  convenience

--> Updated
>
> - introduction:
>    - "... types of mappings: exact, broader or narrower." The tables actually use the terms "exact", "more specific", "more generic" and "related"
--> Updated
>    - "with the Dublin Core" ->  "with Dublin Core"
--> Updated
>    - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing

--> ???
>
> - property definitions
>    - "The resulting set of properties is nearly identical to that chosen by the [jpsearch] initiative."  - 1. Is this still the case after all the changes ?  2. Do we want to stress this fact before even listing the properties?

--> @@ Not done. to be discussed.


>    - title: double quotation mark after String
--> Updated

>    - location: maybe mention http://www.epsg-registry.org/ as a registry of coordinate reference systems (which can be used to identify coordinate systems by URIs)
--> Updated
> - mapping tables
>    - Dublin core: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>    - EBU Core: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is also used
>    - IPTC: the table should have NewsML-G2 in the title
>    - IPTC: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>    - MPEG-7: numTracks: the how to text should be changed to "AudioChannel maps to numTracks of an audio track. For a media resource, the number of video and audio channels can be determined from the number of parallel tracks being described"
>    - TV Anytime: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is also used
>    - F4V: "usually exact" is used

--> All mapping table updated
>
> - examples
>    - there is<span><tt>  markup in sections 6.4 and 6.5

Right the Tool deoes not like <span>. I have to investigate. Or will 
change manually the HTML output ;-(
>
> - ontology
>    - there is an indentation of the 1st line in both the XML and TTL representation

Right the Tool does not like something here. I have to investigate. Or 
will change manually the HTML output ;-(
>
> - references
>    - shouldn't XML schema data types, RDF and OWL2 be among the normative ones?
>    - HTML5: reference a more recent draft?
>    - TTML should probably be normative, as all the other mapped formats are

--> All mapping table updated


see updates
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html

and in the dev space
http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html


>
> Best regards,
> Werner
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
>> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 10:05
>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
>>
>> MAWG Participants,
>>
>>
>> This will be the last chance to review the Ontology for Media Resources
>> 1.0 [CR version to be reviewed] [1]
>>
>> Please have a deep review of this document.
>>
>>
>> I have added in the "Status of this Document" the CR exit criteria.
>> Please review these carefully and we will discuss it in oour call
>> tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> Next week we will probably vote to move it to CR.
>>
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
>> nt-1.0.html
>
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 18:03:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 May 2011 18:03:46 GMT