W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

RE: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 16:33:52 +0200
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09FA94DE17AD5@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Dear Thierry, all,

Here are some comments on the draft CR version.

- status section
  - typo: convinience -> convenience

- introduction:
  - "... types of mappings: exact, broader or narrower." The tables actually use the terms "exact", "more specific", "more generic" and "related" 
  - "with the Dublin Core" -> "with Dublin Core"
  - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
 
- property definitions
  - "The resulting set of properties is nearly identical to that chosen by the [jpsearch] initiative."  - 1. Is this still the case after all the changes ?  2. Do we want to stress this fact before even listing the properties?
  - title: double quotation mark after String  
  - location: maybe mention http://www.epsg-registry.org/ as a registry of coordinate reference systems (which can be used to identify coordinate systems by URIs)

- mapping tables
  - Dublin core: "similar" is used instead of "related"
  - EBU Core: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is also used
  - IPTC: the table should have NewsML-G2 in the title
  - IPTC: "similar" is used instead of "related"
  - MPEG-7: numTracks: the how to text should be changed to "AudioChannel maps to numTracks of an audio track. For a media resource, the number of video and audio channels can be determined from the number of parallel tracks being described"
  - TV Anytime: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is also used
  - F4V: "usually exact" is used

- examples
  - there is <span><tt> markup in sections 6.4 and 6.5 

- ontology
  - there is an indentation of the 1st line in both the XML and TTL representation

- references
  - shouldn't XML schema data types, RDF and OWL2 be among the normative ones?
  - HTML5: reference a more recent draft?
  - TTML should probably be normative, as all the other mapped formats are

Best regards,
Werner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 10:05
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
> 
> MAWG Participants,
> 
> 
> This will be the last chance to review the Ontology for Media Resources
> 1.0 [CR version to be reviewed] [1]
> 
> Please have a deep review of this document.
> 
> 
> I have added in the "Status of this Document" the CR exit criteria.
> Please review these carefully and we will discuss it in oour call
> tomorrow.
> 
> 
> 
> Next week we will probably vote to move it to CR.
> 
> 
> Thierry
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
> nt-1.0.html
Received on Monday, 9 May 2011 14:34:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 May 2011 14:34:23 GMT