W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

RE: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW

From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:06:21 +0200
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09FA94DE17AF8@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Dear Thierry,

Thanks for your updates.

> >    - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
> 
> --> ???

The example column in the container formats table is empty, I think we should have examples there just as in the metadata formats table.

Best regards,
Werner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 20:03
> To: Bailer, Werner
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
> 
> 
> 
> Le 09/05/2011 16:33, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
> > Dear Thierry, all,
> >
> > Here are some comments on the draft CR version.
> >
> > - status section
> >    - typo: convinience ->  convenience
> 
> --> Updated
> >
> > - introduction:
> >    - "... types of mappings: exact, broader or narrower." The tables
> actually use the terms "exact", "more specific", "more generic" and
> "related"
> --> Updated
> >    - "with the Dublin Core" ->  "with Dublin Core"
> --> Updated
> >    - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
> 
> --> ???
> >
> > - property definitions
> >    - "The resulting set of properties is nearly identical to that
> chosen by the [jpsearch] initiative."  - 1. Is this still the case
> after all the changes ?  2. Do we want to stress this fact before even
> listing the properties?
> 
> --> @@ Not done. to be discussed.
> 
> 
> >    - title: double quotation mark after String
> --> Updated
> 
> >    - location: maybe mention http://www.epsg-registry.org/ as a
> registry of coordinate reference systems (which can be used to identify
> coordinate systems by URIs)
> --> Updated
> > - mapping tables
> >    - Dublin core: "similar" is used instead of "related"
> >    - EBU Core: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is
> also used
> >    - IPTC: the table should have NewsML-G2 in the title
> >    - IPTC: "similar" is used instead of "related"
> >    - MPEG-7: numTracks: the how to text should be changed to
> "AudioChannel maps to numTracks of an audio track. For a media
> resource, the number of video and audio channels can be determined from
> the number of parallel tracks being described"
> >    - TV Anytime: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is
> also used
> >    - F4V: "usually exact" is used
> 
> --> All mapping table updated
> >
> > - examples
> >    - there is<span><tt>  markup in sections 6.4 and 6.5
> 
> Right the Tool deoes not like <span>. I have to investigate. Or will
> change manually the HTML output ;-(
> >
> > - ontology
> >    - there is an indentation of the 1st line in both the XML and TTL
> representation
> 
> Right the Tool does not like something here. I have to investigate. Or
> will change manually the HTML output ;-(
> >
> > - references
> >    - shouldn't XML schema data types, RDF and OWL2 be among the
> normative ones?
> >    - HTML5: reference a more recent draft?
> >    - TTML should probably be normative, as all the other mapped
> formats are
> 
> --> All mapping table updated
> 
> 
> see updates
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
> nt-1.0.html
> 
> and in the dev space
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
> 
> 
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Werner
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
> >> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
> >> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 10:05
> >> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >> Subject: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
> >>
> >> MAWG Participants,
> >>
> >>
> >> This will be the last chance to review the Ontology for Media
> Resources
> >> 1.0 [CR version to be reviewed] [1]
> >>
> >> Please have a deep review of this document.
> >>
> >>
> >> I have added in the "Status of this Document" the CR exit criteria.
> >> Please review these carefully and we will discuss it in oour call
> >> tomorrow.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Next week we will probably vote to move it to CR.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thierry
> >>
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
> >> nt-1.0.html
> >
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 07:06:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 May 2011 07:06:51 GMT